I would like to add a few observations about this.

In the future I would like to see more care taken with how things look.  The coding may be finished, but I don't consider the end result of sufficient quality. If the end result doesn't look professional, then Leland has to re-do your work to make it of sufficient quality and fix things that were not done right to begin with.

Here is what I mean:

* The footer is not properly aligned, right to left. Its too far left. 
* The left block of text is weirdly justified, with large spaces between the words. Perhaps make it left justified.
* The magazine cover thumbnail is improperly stretched.  That is not the original width -- I don't know why it's been stretched too wide, but it looks horrible.
* The footer is not properly completed for responsiveness.  In phone size the last column and the image thumbnail both stack weirdly.  The tablet view is also off.

Please see the attached images. 

I don't like to have to spend 30 minutes doing mockups and writing detailed fixes of things that should be obvious. In the future, let's get another person on VeteranLogix side to review work for quality issues like this, before you tell us it's done. Two sets of eyes would be helpful. 




